An edited version of this article first appeared on January 19th 2013 in page 26 of Saturday Nation
Barely a year and a half after the capture and killing of Al
Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, a movie depicting the decade long mission to
capture him has caused uproar from different factions of the American
government, anti-government groups and human rights activists.
The movie, Dark Zero Thirty directed by Kathryn Bigelow
and written by Mark Boal, follows the journey of a CIA team that dedicated
years to following every little detail and clue that could lead to a possible
capture of the world’s most wanted and feared villain.
The movie’s plot commences in 2003 when C.I.A officer Maya
(Jessica Chastain) is sent to the American embassy in Pakistan to work with a
fellow agent Dan (Jason Clarke). The two spend the first few months trying to
get information from Ammar, a detained terrorist. Dan, a cold ruthless man who
prefers monkeys to people as friends, uses torture and humiliation to get
information from Ammar who despite his suffering remains quiet. Eventually they
trick him to giving up the name of Abu Ahmed; an alias used by an old
acquaintance of Bin Laden’s who was now working as his personal courier.
Dan is reassigned and Maya fixates the next few years of her
life on the single task of finding Abu Ahmed. In the process, she survives
several blasts and an attack by gun men. Furthermore, she loses numerous
friends and colleagues through a suicide bombing. In 2009, a detainee claims
that the man identified as Abu Ahmed from a photograph they have is a man he
personally buried in 2001. Maya’s seniors conclude that Abu Ahmed is long dead
and they’ve wasted years following a dead trail.
Maya remains adamant and some information from Moroccan
intelligence leads her on a new theory that Abu Ahmed was actually alive and
the photograph they had been using was
that of Abu Ahmed’s brother who had a striking resemblance to him. With the
help of Dan who is now in back at the C.I.A headquarters, they are able to
locate Abu Ahmed who eventually leads them to Osama’s compound and consequently
to the raid and killing of the man with a 25 million dollar bounty on his head
on 2nd may 2011.
Dark Zero Thirty
which was released worldwide on 11th January had to postpone its release
scheduled for October last year until after the American elections. This was
due to claims that it would serve as a propaganda tool for the Obama campaign
team, to who the killing of Bin Laden was a big selling point. The title, Dark zero thirty, is a military term for
30 minutes after midnight. Director Kathryn Bigelow adds that the title is also
symbolic to the darkness and secrecy that cloaked the entire decade long
mission.
The movie has been a commercial success beating star studded Gangster Squad in ticket sales when they
both premiered last weekend. So far, it has raised over $29.5 million as of last
weekend and has bugged five Oscar nominations. Most critics have reviewed the
movie well with movie review website rotten Tomatoes describing it as “gripping,
suspenseful, and brilliantly crafted” and goes on to say “ Zero Dark Thirty dramatizes the hunt for Osama bin Laden with
intelligence and an eye for detail.”
However, not everyone gave the movie a good rating. The film
has enraged factions of the American people including senators led by John
McCain claiming the movie’s producers were given access to classified
information by the C.I.A and Obama administration; a claim that the American
government has denied. This forced the
acting C.I.A Director to issue a message which in part read “What I want you to
know is that Zero Dark Thirty is a dramatization, not a realistic
portrayal of the facts. CIA interacted with the filmmakers through our
Office of Public Affairs but, as is true with any entertainment project with
which we interact, we do not control the final product.”
The movies off camera drama did not end there. There have
been further claims that the movie is pro-torture and that it wrongfully
portrays the use of torture as a key tool that was used to acquire information
that led to Bin Laden’s capture.
And it’s not without good cause. The first hour of the two
and a half hour long film contains gory, brutal scenes of prisoners being tortured
and humiliated. At best, a prisoner is punched around and at worst they are
water boarded, stripped, locked in tiny boxes, denied sleep and made to crawl
around naked with a dog leash around their neck. Author Greg Mitchell wrote
that "the film’s depiction of torture helping to get bin Laden is muddled
at best—but the overall impression by the end, for most viewers, probably will
be: Yes, torture played a key (if not the key) role."
![]() |
Author Greg Mitchell |
Other critics had less than flattering remarks about the
movie. Journalist Michael Wolff slammed the movie as a "nasty piece of
pulp and propaganda" and Bigelow as a "fetishist and sadist" for
distorting history with a pro-torture viewpoint.